Internship Assessment
UNIVERSITY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES
FACULTY OF HISTORY
***
INTERNSHIP ASSESSMENT
1. Student internship: is an assignment that requires students' practice and report in the process of learning and carrying out scientific research. Basic requirement of the internship is that students must perform a sightseeing, survey, field trip, and participate in practices at the local or recruiting unit for research or work.
Currently, the Faculty's training program has 2 basic internship requirements:
2. Specialized internship 1 (2 credits):
- Prerequisites/Previous module: Having studied basic modules
- Practice in a specific area. Help students understand and apply the learned knowledge in carrying practical surveys of historical science related to the major.
- Objectives: the module is aimed at providing students with knowledge and skill/theory and fieldwork, opportunity to search for documents, witness interview, preparing proposals and writing local history and career history.
3. Specialized internship 2 (4 credits):
- Prerequisites/Previous module: Having studied basic and specialized modules
- Practical internship is according to scientific research topics on site in order to conduct practical surveys on specialized or major-related scientific and historical issues; apply learned knowledge into social circumstances through internship reports, feelings towards history, solution recommendation, etc.
- Objectives: the module is aimed at providing students with knowledge and skill/theory and practice on practical topics.
2. Internship assessment
Assessment criteria for students’ internship based on two main contents (total score: 10 points).
- Internship: (5 points)
|
Criteria |
Very good (5-6 points) |
Good (4 to < 5 points) |
Average (3 to < 4 points) |
Failed (< 3 points) |
|
Attitude towards work and research during internship |
Show earnest and prudent attitude towards work and research, fully comply with work regulations. |
Show earnest and prudent attitude towards work and research, but still have some insignificant limitations (come in late or leave early, etc). |
Fully comply with work regulations, but lack enthusiasm. |
Fail to show earnest, prudent attitude and do not fully comply with work regulations. |
|
Degree of cooperation with colleagues and fellow students in internship |
Cooperate well with colleagues and fellow students, create a happy and united work environment. |
Cooperate well with colleagues and fellow students, but fail to create a favorable work environment. |
Cooperate with colleagues and fellow students at some levels, but create a stressful work environment. |
Fail to cooperate with colleagues and fellow students. |
|
Practical capacity upon problem approaching and solving |
Solve work contents and problems very effectively. |
Solve work contents and problems effectively. |
Make effort but fail to solve work contents and problems effectively. |
Ineffectively solve or fail to solve work contents and problems. |
- Internship results (report) (5 points)
|
Criteria |
Very good (3-4 points) |
Good (2 to < 3 points) |
Average (1 to <2 points) |
Failed (<1 point) |
|
Report topic and structure |
Appropriate and logical topic and structure. |
Appropriate topic and fairly logical structure |
Fairly appropriate and logical topic and structure. |
Inappropriate and illogical topic and structure. |
|
Scientific aspect |
Sufficient content and scientific format. |
Relatively sufficient content and scientific format. |
Insufficient content and scientific format. |
Insufficient content and unscientific format. |
|
Personal opinion |
Show a clear, specific and practical personal opinion, specifically, be capable of applying in practice. |
Show a clear and specific personal opinion, but less capable of applying and deploying in practice. |
Show certain personal opinions which are not clear and specific. |
Show no personal opinion. |
|
Significance of practical implications |
Show highly practical significance, be likely to apply directly in practice. |
Show practical significance but less likely to apply in practice. |
Little practical. |
Show no practical significance. |
|
Report format |
Have good format with no technical errors. |
Have relatively good format with few technical errors. |
Still have many technical errors. |
Fail to submit report. |
