Project assessment criteria

Excellent (9 – 10)

Very good (8 – <9)

Good (7 – <8)

Average (5 -<7)

Fail (<5)

Theoretical and practical significances of the project

Project is very relevant or

has significant importance/

authenticity to field and

will make an important

contribution to field.

Project has fair relevance or

significance/ authenticity to field and will make a good contribution to field.

Project only moderate relevance or significance/ authenticity to field and will make a nominal contribution to field.

Project has little relevance or significance/

authenticity

to field and will make little contribution to field.

No contribution

Methods of studies

Data interpretation is appropriate and creatively uses correct methodology;

Data interpretation is appropriate and uses many correct methodology;

Data interpretation is appropriate and uses some correct methodology;

Data interpretation is appropriate and uses limited number of correct methodology;

Data interpretation is inappropriate and/or uses incorrect methodology;

On the project content

Shows great depth of knowledge and learning, reveals feelings and thoughts, abstract ideas reflected through use of specific details.

Relates learning with research and project, personal and general reflections included, uses concrete language.

Does not go deeply into the reflection of learning, generalizations and limited insight, uses some detail.

Little or no explanation or reflection on learning, no or few details to support reflection

Shows no evidence of learning or reflection, plagiarism.

On project presentation form

• No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling.
• No errors sentence structure and word usage.
• All cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format with no errors.
• Done in the correct format with no errors.

• Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling.
• Almost no errors in sentence structure and word usage.
• Almost cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format. Inconsistencies evident
• Done in the correct format with few errors.

• Some errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling.
• Some errors in sentence structure and word usage.
• Some cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format.
• Done in the correct format with some errors.

• Numerous and distracting errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling.
• Numerous and distracting errors in sentence structure and word usage.
• Few cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format.
• Done in the correct format with many errors

Project presentation form is done incorrect.